"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet." - William Gibson

First, scale-up means learning by doing, which takes time in the energy industry. Where energy technology relies on conversion processes — as with next-generation nuclear energy, biofuels or carbon capture and storage (CCS) — historically it has taken three years to build a demonstration plant, one year to start it up and two to five years to overcome setbacks and reach satisfactory operability. So it can take a decade to reach the point where one is confident enough to build the first full-scale commercial plant. It can take another decade to build a dozen.

Leverage existing infrastructure: After reaching materiality, growth curves have historically levelled off (Fig. 1). This is our second law. Unlike consumer goods that may become obsolete in a few years, the capital goods of the energy system have a lifetime of 25–50 years. That means only 2–4% of existing technology needs replacing in a given year. These replacement rates are hard to increase because the economic barrier to replacing old technology is extremely high: industry will only consider early retirement of the existing capital stock if the total cost of the new technology (capital and operating costs) falls below the operating cost of the old.

Read More

{ 0 comments }

Best Sentence I Read Today…

by Nate on January 15, 2010

in Re-Posts

From Paul Kedrosky at edge.org:

“First, the Internet is, for me, a kind of internal cognition combustion engine, something that vastly accelerates my ability to travel vast landscapes.”

More Here

{ 0 comments }

We have to decouple feedstocks from fossil fuels

3 January 2010 Re-Posts

What energy sources have a feedstock decoupled from fossil fuels? Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Tidal, Biomass?

There are multiple problems that will make it difficult for biodiesel to ever compete without subsidies. In a nutshell the key problem is that the feedstock costs are linked to fossil fuel prices. The feedstock is generally a vegetable oil [...]

Read More ...

Put a price on carbon already

1 January 2010 Re-Posts

From the Economist survey:
The credit crisis also revealed a basic problem with the clean-energy business. Fossil fuels are, in terms of the energy they store, remarkably inexpensive to get out of the ground and sell. That makes dirty industrial processes irresistibly cheap—so long as they are not required to cover the costs of the pollution [...]

Read More ...

Where will biomass come from, Khosla

4 December 2009 Reference

WhereWillBiomassComeFrom

Read More ...

Biofuels Pathways, Khosla

4 November 2009 Reference

Biofuels Pathways Paper

Read More ...

The Truth about Biofuels

30 October 2009 Re-Posts

A lot of posts this week based on the findings of various reports on biofuels. The problem is complicated because depending on the application and the change in land use the impact can swing widely from negative to positive. Some thoughts on what a good biofuels project/policy would consist of.
1. If you can [...]

Read More ...

Biochar Applications in the Developing World

30 October 2009 Re-Posts

A great example of using new technologies in the developing world. As I mentioned earlier this week, as we get closer to a carbon bill there will be wide application for any process that upgrade soil contents.
The core of re:char’s technology, Jason explained, is a process called pyrolisis, which takes place by heating to [...]

Read More ...